6 hours ago
NY Times Rebuts Former Editor’s Allegations of “Anti‑Trans” Coverage Culture
READ TIME: 3 MIN.
The New York Times has released a formal statement rejecting allegations by former editor Billie Jean Sweeney that the paper’s leadership directed anti‑transgender coverage and suppressed internal dissent over its reporting on trans communities. The statement, published on the Times Company’s website under the title “Fact‑Checking False Claims About Our Gender Identity Coverage, ” responds to an interview with Sweeney that ran on Trans News Network in late 2025.
In that interview, Sweeney, a transgender journalist who previously worked as an editor on the Times’ international desk, alleged that senior leaders had cultivated a “militant” stance on coverage of transgender people leading up to the 2024 U. S. elections. She claimed that publisher A. G. Sulzberger delivered internal speeches about election coverage that signaled a hardened position on reporting about trans issues and that internal forums where staff could question coverage decisions were subsequently curtailed. Sweeney also said the paper failed to employ openly trans journalists to cover transgender issues in the newsroom, arguing that this absence contributed to harmful reporting.
The Times’ new statement directly challenges those characterizations, describing the Trans News Network post as containing “numerous falsehoods” about its gender identity coverage and about specific journalists involved in that reporting. It says the piece “maligned” staff and was “presented as news” despite not meeting “the most basic journalistic standards of fairness or accuracy. ” According to the Times, the interviewer did not seek comment from the organization before publication and later declined to add what the Times describes as substantive corrections or the full statement it provided.
The statement lists several specific claims it labels inaccurate or “wholly invented conspiracy theories. ” It denies that top leadership issued directives to “attack trans people” in coverage or that stories were commissioned to please the Trump administration, calling both assertions “false. ” The Times also disputes a claim that a 2024 story on transgender activists opened with a quote from author J. K. Rowling, asserting that this detail was simply incorrect. Additionally, the company says the piece misidentified editor Virginia Hughes as “co‑head” of the Investigations desk, which the Times says is not her role.
Defending its broader approach, the Times states that its coverage of gender identity is “guided by facts and questions” and that it aims for “fair‑minded, fact‑based reporting. ” The statement says its journalists have reported extensively on the lives of transgender people and the discrimination they face, as well as on evolving cultural, medical, and legal debates around gender‑affirming care for adolescents.
Sweeney’s interview did not emerge in a vacuum; it followed years of mounting criticism from LGBTQ+ advocates who argue the Times’ reporting has amplified anti‑trans narratives. In early 2023, more than 100 LGBTQ+ organizations and community leaders signed an open letter accusing the paper of running “biased” and “inaccurate” coverage that, they said, endangered transgender people and especially youth. That letter called on the Times to stop publishing what signatories described as anti‑trans stories and to hire at least four full‑time trans journalists to report on trans communities.
Trans advocates and media critics have argued that mainstream outlets, including the Times, have helped “mainstream” language and narratives that originated in anti‑trans political campaigns. In a 2025 essay for Assigned Media, Sweeney wrote that major outlets had “legitimized disinformation” about transgender people, particularly around gender‑affirming care, and that this coverage contributed to a broader political environment targeting trans rights. She connected that pattern to U. S. efforts to restrict care and to vilifying rhetoric by political figures, arguing that contemptuous portrayals in media could encourage discrimination and policy attacks on trans communities.
The Times’ latest statement does not directly address demands from LGBTQ+ advocates about staffing or specific editorial changes but reiterates its commitment to “deeply and accurately” covering trans people’s lives and the bigotry they face. For many transgender readers and allies, the dispute underscores longstanding questions about who gets to shape coverage of trans communities and how newsroom power dynamics affect what stories are told.
The public back‑and‑forth between Sweeney, Trans News Network, and the New York Times highlights an ongoing accountability debate inside journalism: how legacy outlets report on marginalized groups, how they respond when those communities and former staffers criticize that work, and what standards should guide coverage of transgender people at a time of escalating legislative attacks and social hostility.
